Why Smart Contract Wallets Fall Short for Institutions

Why Smart Contract Wallets Fall Short for Institutions



In the evolving landscape of blockchain technology, the security of on-chain assets is paramount, especially for institutions, enterprises, and organizations handling substantial funds. While smart contract wallets have become a popular choice particularly for “crypto-native” groups, they carry inherent risks due to their transparency. This blog post delves into why smart contract wallets might not be a secure option for enterprises and how Multi-Party Computation (MPC) wallets, like Tholos, offer a safer alternative.

The Transparency Dilemma of Smart Contract Wallets

Smart contract wallets are inherently public-facing, which means critical aspects of wallet behavior are visible to third parties. This visibility includes who signed a transaction, the number of signatures required, and the timing of each transaction. While transparency is a cornerstone of blockchain technology, it can become a liability, particularly when it comes to the security of large on-chain holdings. The crypto currency space is a high-value target for state-sponsored groups and seasoned black-hat hackers making it particularly vulnerable.

Risks Associated with Smart Contract Wallet Transparency

The open nature of smart contract wallets introduces additional risks to organizations:

  • Exposure of Signers' Identities: Attackers can potentially identify the individuals who sign transactions.
  • Insight into Signing Behaviors: Observing when and how often transactions are signed can give attackers valuable insights into the signing behaviors and patterns of an organization.
  • Knowledge of Approval Processes: Understanding the number of signers needed for transaction approval can aid in strategizing attacks.

This transparency can lead to physical attack vectors, where attackers may target individuals to coerce transaction approvals. Though it may sound extreme, the stakes are incredibly high in scenarios involving millions or even billions of dollars.

MPC Wallets: A Safer, Private-Facing Alternative

MPC-based wallets like Tholos provide a more secure solution. They are private-facing, which means crucial information about transaction approvals and signer identities is not publicly accessible. This heightened privacy significantly reduces the risk of physical attacks as it becomes challenging for attackers to:

  • Identify specific individuals to target.
  • Ascertain the number of individuals needed to compromise a transaction.

Moreover, Tholos's advanced MPC implementations offer customizable signing schemes, allowing organizations to tailor their security measures with precision.

For organizations prioritizing the protection of their on-chain assets, MPC wallets represent a more secure and sophisticated solution. While smart contract wallets have their merits, their inherent transparency can pose significant security risks. Tholos's MPC wallet technology addresses these concerns, providing a robust, flexible, and private solution for managing high-value on-chain assets securely.

To learn more about how Tholos's MPC wallet technology can safeguard your organization's on-chain assets, get in contact. Protect your digital assets with the security and sophistication they deserve.